(r5rs.info.gz) Pattern language
Info Catalog
(r5rs.info.gz) Binding constructs for syntactic keywords
(r5rs.info.gz) Macros
4.3.2 Pattern language
----------------------
A <transformer spec> has the following form:
-- : syntax-rules <literals> <syntax rule> ...,
_Syntax:_ <Literals> is a list of identifiers and each <syntax
rule> should be of the form
(<pattern> <template>)
The <pattern> in a <syntax rule> is a list <pattern> that begins
with the keyword for the macro.
A <pattern> is either an identifier, a constant, or one of the
following
(<pattern> ...)
(<pattern> <pattern> ... . <pattern>)
(<pattern> ... <pattern> <ellipsis>)
#(<pattern> ...)
#(<pattern> ... <pattern> <ellipsis>)
and a template is either an identifier, a constant, or one of the
following
(<element> ...)
(<element> <element> ... . <template>)
#(<element> ...)
where an <element> is a <template> optionally followed by an
<ellipsis> and an <ellipsis> is the identifier "`...'" (which
cannot be used as an identifier in either a template or a pattern).
_Semantics:_ An instance of `syntax-rules' produces a new macro
transformer by specifying a sequence of hygienic rewrite rules. A
use of a macro whose keyword is associated with a transformer
specified by `syntax-rules' is matched against the patterns
contained in the <syntax rule>s, beginning with the leftmost
<syntax rule>. When a match is found, the macro use is
transcribed hygienically according to the template.
An identifier that appears in the pattern of a <syntax rule> is a
_pattern variable_, unless it is the keyword that begins the
pattern, is listed in <literals>, or is the identifier "`...'".
Pattern variables match arbitrary input elements and are used to
refer to elements of the input in the template. It is an error
for the same pattern variable to appear more than once in a
<pattern>.
The keyword at the beginning of the pattern in a <syntax rule> is
not involved in the matching and is not considered a pattern
variable or literal identifier.
_Rationale:_ The scope of the keyword is determined by the
expression or syntax definition that binds it to the
associated macro transformer. If the keyword were a pattern
variable or literal identifier, then the template that
follows the pattern would be within its scope regardless of
whether the keyword were bound by `let-syntax' or by
`letrec-syntax'.
Identifiers that appear in <literals> are interpreted as literal
identifiers to be matched against corresponding subforms of the
input. A subform in the input matches a literal identifier if and
only if it is an identifier and either both its occurrence in the
macro expression and its occurrence in the macro definition have
the same lexical binding, or the two identifiers are equal and
both have no lexical binding.
A subpattern followed by `...' can match zero or more elements of
the input. It is an error for `...' to appear in <literals>.
Within a pattern the identifier `...' must follow the last element
of a nonempty sequence of subpatterns.
More formally, an input form F matches a pattern P if and only if:
* P is a non-literal identifier; or
* P is a literal identifier and F is an identifier with the same
binding; or
* P is a list `(P_1 ... P_n)' and F is a list of n forms that
match P_1 through P_n, respectively; or
* P is an improper list `(P_1 P_2 ... P_n . P_n+1)' and F is a
list or improper list of n or more forms that match P_1
through P_n, respectively, and whose nth "cdr" matches P_n+1;
or
* P is of the form `(P_1 ... P_n P_n+1 <ellipsis>)' where
<ellipsis> is the identifier `...' and F is a proper list of
at least n forms, the first n of which match P_1 through P_n,
respectively, and each remaining element of F matches P_n+1;
or
* P is a vector of the form `#(P_1 ... P_n)' and F is a vector
of n forms that match P_1 through P_n; or
* P is of the form `#(P_1 ... P_n P_n+1 <ellipsis>)' where
<ellipsis> is the identifier `...' and F is a vector of n or
more forms the first n of which match P_1 through P_n,
respectively, and each remaining element of F matches P_n+1;
or
* P is a datum and F is equal to P in the sense of the `equal?'
procedure.
It is an error to use a macro keyword, within the scope of its
binding, in an expression that does not match any of the patterns.
When a macro use is transcribed according to the template of the
matching <syntax rule>, pattern variables that occur in the
template are replaced by the subforms they match in the input.
Pattern variables that occur in subpatterns followed by one or more
instances of the identifier `...' are allowed only in subtemplates
that are followed by as many instances of `...'. They are
replaced in the output by all of the subforms they match in the
input, distributed as indicated. It is an error if the output
cannot be built up as specified.
Identifiers that appear in the template but are not pattern
variables or the identifier `...' are inserted into the output as
literal identifiers. If a literal identifier is inserted as a
free identifier then it refers to the binding of that identifier
within whose scope the instance of `syntax-rules' appears. If a
literal identifier is inserted as a bound identifier then it is in
effect renamed to prevent inadvertent captures of free identifiers.
Derived expression type:: then they are hygienic (as required) and
the following is not an error.
(let ((=> #f))
(cond (#t => 'ok))) ==> ok
The macro transformer for `cond' recognizes `=>' as a local
variable, and hence an expression, and not as the top-level
identifier `=>', which the macro transformer treats as a syntactic
keyword. Thus the example expands into
(let ((=> #f))
(if #t (begin => 'ok)))
instead of
(let ((=> #f))
(let ((temp #t))
(if temp ('ok temp))))
which would result in an invalid procedure call.
Info Catalog
(r5rs.info.gz) Binding constructs for syntactic keywords
(r5rs.info.gz) Macros
automatically generated byinfo2html